Podcast 12—Day 33/40
Awaken the Good—Heal the Body
A personal exhortation to specific leaders
A personal exhortation to specific leaders
Opening
Welcome to Into Integrity.
This is Kelly O’Donnell.
Thanks for joining us as we follow Jesus, living integrity and confronting corruption.
Our theme is Awaken the Good—Heal the Body: A
personal exhortation to specific leaders.
We call upon people and specific leaders in
particular to take note of their responsibility to do good and to help bring
healing in the protracted NCI fraud and the related wrongful dismissals. We
also share five key messages from PETRA People postings. They provide
principles and guidance for good practice in confronting corruption and acting
with integrity.
Our prayer is that these materials, will help awaken the good in you,
and help you bring healing to the Body of Christ and your own organizations.
And we pray for courage, conviction, contrition, and change—Spirit-birthed,
authentic repentance:
First, to acknowledge—I was wrong, I am responsible
Second, to apologize—I am sorry, I ask forgiveness
Third, to amend—I will change, I will restore
Second, to apologize—I am sorry, I ask forgiveness
Third, to amend—I will change, I will restore
See the related PETRA People posting on “Lessons
for Leaders” (23 July 2015). It features eight principles for dealing with mistakes
and wrongdoing in organizations.
Today is day 33 of the 40 day FAST. We invite you to join
with us and others during Part Two of the FAST now, 6-26 December 2019.
A
reminder of the purpose of
the Into Integrity FAST. It is to call attention to--and confront--the lack of
disclosures by specific organizations, leaders, people affected by the
international Nordic Capital Investment KB fraud (NCI) as well as the related
dismissals that Michele and I have received. This is a combined food FAst for
genuine contrition and a hunger STrike for resolute action by specific people and
organizations primarily within the Church Mission Community (CMC).
You can access a transcript of this podcast with more resources and links on the Into Integrity weblog.
It’s time for solidarity.
Awaken the good. Heal the Body.
Take a stand, speak up, and live in integrity.
Will you consider: Changing your course and bringing into the light publicly how NCI has affected you and how you have dealt with it over the years--verifiably disclosing and authorizing internal and independent reviews?
I also want to
respectfully ask Bill Taylor, Bertil Ekstrom, Rose Dorsett, and KK Rajendran,
who are current or past members of the World Evangelical Alliance--Mission
Commission, to review and reconsider my wrongful dismissal in view of the NCI,
fraud and overlapping dysfunction and deviance. Their joint letter to me in November
2006 was wrong. The subsequent avoidance to meet with Michele and me (as the
paper trail shows, through December 2007) was wrong. And the letter of
dismissal in December 2007, especially as the international NCI fraud was
coming into the light, was wrong. The 2006 letter in particular was used against Michele and me, especially
YWAM leaders, to avoid addressing the multi-million dollar NCI fraud that was
rampant in YWAM and other organizations. We and others were in the process of
exposing NCI in 2007-2008 in cooperation with government investigations
(especially Sweden and The Netherlands, and also France, USA, and UK).
We can
only wonder what could have happened if specific leaders would have stood by
our side, would have met with Michele and me and others, and would have joined
together in solidarity, to get informed and take a stand to expose the
nefarious, unfolding NCI corruption. We believe that it could have turned the
tide in support of the official government investigations and the vulnerable
victims including ourselves. It could have encouraged organizations to
verifiably disclose and authorize independent reviews, could have educated the
international Church Mission Community about fraud and good practice, and
helped prevent further corruption.
1. Looking Good versus Doing Good
2. Good Principles and Good Practices
3. Tricks for Feigning Good Practice
4. Rationalizing Our Responsibilities
5. Awakening the Good in You

Looking Good. “But
at any time an organization makes a seriously wrong decision, its leaders
should call for an intensive postmortem. Such learning opportunities are too
often overlooked. The tendency is simply to call on the public relations
department to spin the matter, to make another inadequately thought-out
decision, and perhaps to scapegoat, even fire, a few staff members. Because
most companies cover up their mistakes instead of learning from them, systemic
flaws in information flow tend to remain to do their damage another day.” (pp.
22-23) Transparency: How Leaders Create a
Culture of Candor (2008). Warren Bennis, Daniel Goleman, James
O'Toole, and Patricia Ward Biederman (Note for more quotes from the book
Transparency, click here)
Doing Good.
NCI is an
international fraud which has only partially been dealt with by Sweden.
Unsubstantiated broad assertions without clear documentary backing and which do
not fit with the documentation, might look good, but they are not helpful.
Financial policies look good, but they require responsible and ethical action
to apply them. Money flows have gone to Mercy Ministries associations and Board
members, the NGF foundation, and Le Rucher as well as to YWAM personnel and
projects. The fuller story needs to be disclosed and its broader nature
investigated. Those organizations and individuals receiving NCI monies that are
net positive especially need to help recover funds. Both the governments and
people in the church-mission community have important roles to play. No one
here is implying intentionality or criminality. But there is an ethical and
probably legal need to disclose and return money. And until this
happens, a huge dark shadow will continue to hang over the church-mission
community in addition to the people/organizations affected by NCI.
[Leaders and everyone in the international church-mission
community (CMC) must resist the temptation of trying to look good, by
whitewashing tough realities and slanting the truth about inadequacies,
mistakes, and wrongdoing. We have to do
good, and be good.]
Good Principles and Good Practices (PPNet, April 2014)
There are a growing number of efforts across sectors to prevent and deal with corruption. This entry highlights 10 of them, many having a global reach. We strongly welcome these efforts and encourage people to rally behind them!
To be effective, major
anti-corruption efforts need consensus on guiding principles, unity in public
support, and commitment to practical applications. Practical applications can
be very challenging though, where these hindering factors exist: limited
experience/interest in dealing with corruption; risks of reprisals and lack of
whistleblower protection; threats to livelihoods, revenue streams, status,
reputations, public opinion, and power structures; and desires to maintain the
belief that one’s personal/organisational “world” is safe, good, and impervious
to corruption. The result of these hindrances is often a substantial and
deceptive gap between our good principles and our good practices—ultimately at
the expense of vulnerable people, especially the poor of the world.
[Leaders and everyone in the international
church-mission community (CMC) must unite
against corruption and live in integrity. Do what is right, even if there are
risks. Act resolutely to protect vulnerable people. We can close the gaps
between good principles and good practices.]
Message Three:

Ten Tactics for Feigning Good Practice
Here are some tactical
tricks that illustrate what not to do when we
and organizations are called upon to transparently give an account—be it via
routine self-assessments, post-mortem reviews of mistakes, or special requests
to explain our actions. These tactics are intentional illusions and
manipulative maneuvers that seemingly protect ourselves and our organizations.
Ultimately, however they undermine our credibility, conscience, and
anti-corruption safeguards. Don’t go there. And don’t remain silent when you
see them.
--1. Delegate the matter to someone
else internally--diffuse it, distance yourself from it—and do everything to
avoid an independent review.
--2. Avoid, reword, or repackage, the
issues--obfuscate the facts, or at least talk tentatively or vaguely about some
mistakes maybe in the past and that you or someone could probably have done a
better job…but go no further; rationalize and/or disguise any culpability.
--3. Focus on minor or “other” things
so as to look like you are focusing on the central things, punctuating it all
with the language of transparency-accountability.
--4. Appeal to your “integrity and to
“acting with the highest standards" without demonstrating either.
--5. Point out your past track
record. Highlight anything positive that you are doing/contributing now.
--6. Ask and assume that people
should trust you without verification or at least offer some general assurances
that you have or will be looking into the matter and all is OK.
--7. State that you are under attack
or at least that you are not being treated fairly or that people just don’t
understand.
--8. Mention other peoples’ (alleged)
problems, question their motives and credibility; dress someone else in your
own dirty clothes, especially if they are noisome question-askers or
whistleblowers.
--9. Prop up the “good old boys’
leadership club,” reshuffle the leadership deck if necessary yet without
changing leaders or their power or how they can cover for each other in the
name of “loyalty” and on behalf of the “greater good,” and try to hold out
until the dust settles and the “uncomfortable” stuff hopefully goes away.
--10. So in short, don’t really do
anything with real transparency and accountability; rather, maintain your
self-interests, lifestyle, affiliations, and illusions of moral congruity, even
if it means recalibrating your conscience—essentially, acting corruptly via
complicity, cover-ups, and cowardice.
[Leaders and everyone in the international
church-mission community (CMC) must recognize that there
are lots of illusions to cover up poor practice. Recognize them. Don’t imitate
them. And expose them when we see them.]
Message Four:
Rationalizing Our Responsibility to Confront the Deviant and Protect the Innocent(PPNet, April 2016)
Rationalizing Our Responsibility to Confront the Deviant and Protect the Innocent(PPNet, April 2016)

Good Hand Washing: Ten Tactics for Feigning Responsibility. Here are 10 ways to rationalize away our responsibility for dealing with fraud and other forms of corruption. As we review them carefully, they can help us to see how we might be washing our hands but not washing our hearts when it comes to confronting deviant people and protecting innocent people. The moral disease continues to thrive. This is especially true in the ongoing NCI KB fraud case, a key focus of this weblog. Note that these 10 “good hand washing” tactics build upon the 10 Tactics for Feigning Good Practice featured in the last entry (Feb-March 2016)—have a look there too.
I am not responsible and we are not
responsible, because...
--1. It’s been a long time; it happened a long time ago….
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that it’s no longer relevant.
--2. It’s so common these days…
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that it is not really important.
--1. It’s been a long time; it happened a long time ago….
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that it’s no longer relevant.
--2. It’s so common these days…
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that it is not really important.
--3. We’ve all moved on…new people are in
our organization…
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that it no longer applies to us.
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that it no longer applies to us.
--4. No one really knows the full story
of what really happened…
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend it is all just too mysterious and confusing.
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend it is all just too mysterious and confusing.
--5. Governments and local authorities
are responsible…
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that we have no or little responsibility.
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that we have no or little responsibility.
--6. We’ve already dealt with this matter…we
even have annual audits…
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend
we have already done our ethical duty and good practice.
--7. We are not responsible to
some ad hoc group asking for disclosures…what right do they have …
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that accountability/citizens groups have no moral authority.
--8. People asking for transparency and accountability have problems… their motives are also wrong…they should forgive and move on…what do they really hope to gain from this matter?…
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that others are not qualified or justified to call for disclosures.
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that accountability/citizens groups have no moral authority.
--8. People asking for transparency and accountability have problems… their motives are also wrong…they should forgive and move on…what do they really hope to gain from this matter?…
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that others are not qualified or justified to call for disclosures.
--9. We are being harassed by
people asking for disclosures….
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that we are the ones being mistreated, victimized, exploited.
So let’s wash our hands of it and pretend that we are the ones being mistreated, victimized, exploited.
--10. We are doing good things to help others…we are good people, good
employees, workers, citizens...
So let’s wash our
hands and pretend that our goodness in some areas exonerates us from conforming
to good practice standards in other areas.
[Leaders and everyone in the international
church-mission community (CMC) must practice the highest standards of
transparency and accountability. We must acknowledge our own propensity
for acting deceptively and cowardly (corruption) as well as our own capacity
for acting truthfully and heroically (integrity).]

Part One includes
resources to help you understand ordinary heroism: the good and bad within
everyone, the pressures to rationalize and support evil, and examples of
ordinary people doing good. How do we awaken the good and the heroic in
ourselves to help others, act with integrity, and confront evil? ...
“Heroism can be defined as having four key
features: a) it must be engaged in voluntarily; b) it must involve a risk or
potential sacrifice, such as the threat of death, an immediate threat to
physical integrity, a long-term threat to health, or the potential to for
serious degradation of one’s quality of life; c) it must be conducted in
service to one or more other people or the community as a whole, d) and it must
be without secondary, extrinsic gain anticipated at the time of act.” The Lucifer Effect:
Understanding How Good People Turn Evil (p.
466, 2008)
We are not aware of any further
action undertaken by organizations to investigate and disclose how they may
have been affected by NCI KB in line with the specific concerns in the
petition. A few individuals over the past months have sent personal
emails, but nothing official and nothing related to taking any action. Click here to see
the paper trail: (August 2014--current). We
thus continue the resolute, public call a) for assistance from all
those affected in various ways by the NCI fraud; and b) for verifiable
disclosures/independent reviews (transparency and accountability) by four
of the organizations listed in the petition.
[Leaders and everyone in the
international church-mission community (CMC) are “ordinary
people” who, like everyone else in the
world, can awaken the good in them to courageously do what is right in spite of
any external pressures and inner anxieties to do otherwise. The good and the
heroic in us can trump evil.]
Thank you for joining us for this episode of Into Integrity:
Awakening the Good—Heal the Body: A personal exhortation to specific leaders.
Awakening the Good—Heal the Body: A personal exhortation to specific leaders.
You can access a transcript of this podcast along with
related resources and links, on the Into Integrity weblog.
Our prayer is that these materials will help awaken the good in you,
and help you bring healing to the Body of Christ and your own organizations.
And we pray for courage, conviction, contrition, and change—Spirit-birthed,
authentic repentance:
First, to acknowledge—I was wrong, I am responsible
Second, to apologize—I am sorry, I ask forgiveness
Third, to amend—I will change, I will restore
Second, to apologize—I am sorry, I ask forgiveness
Third, to amend—I will change, I will restore
Thank you again for your encouragement, prayers, and support as we continue Part Two of the Into Integrity FAST (6-26 December).
It’s time for solidarity.
Awaken the good. Heal the Body.
Take a stand, speak up, and live in integrity.
And spread the word.
No comments:
Post a Comment